<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">nefr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Нефрология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg)</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1561-6274</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2541-9439</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24884/1561-6274-2010-14-2-60-66</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">nefr-1219</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЖУРНАЛ В ЖУРНАЛЕ. АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ УРОЛОГИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>JOURNAL IN THE JOURNAL. ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF UROLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ ¹¹C -ХОЛИН ПОЗИТРОННО-ЭМИССИОННОЙ ТОМОГРАФИИ В ДИАГНОСТИКЕ РЕЦИДИВА РАКА ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ ПОСЛЕ РАДИОТЕРАПИИ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ¹¹C-CHOLINE POSITRON  EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER RECURRENCE AFTER RADIOTHERAPY</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Де Йонг</surname><given-names>И. Я.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>De Yong</surname><given-names>I. Ya.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кафедра урологии</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бреусма</surname><given-names>А. Й.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Breusma</surname><given-names>A. Y.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кафедра урологии</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Аль-Шукри</surname><given-names>С. Х.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Al-Shukri</surname><given-names>S. H.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кафедра урологии</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Боровец</surname><given-names>С. Ю.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Borovets</surname><given-names>S. Yu.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кафедра урологии</p><p>197022, Санкт-Петербург, ул. Л. Толстого, 17. Кафедра урологии СПбГМУ им. акад. И.П. Павлова.</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Рыбалов</surname><given-names>М. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Rybalov</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кафедра урологии</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-1"><institution>Медицинский центр университета г. Гронинген</institution><country>Netherlands</country></aff><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-2"><institution>Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет им. акад. И.П. Павлова</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2010</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>02</month><year>2010</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>60</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Де Йонг И.Я., Бреусма А.Й., Аль-Шукри С.Х., Боровец С.Ю., Рыбалов М.А., 2010</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2010</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Де Йонг И.Я., Бреусма А.Й., Аль-Шукри С.Х., Боровец С.Ю., Рыбалов М.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">De Yong I.Y., Breusma A.Y., Al-Shukri S.H., Borovets S.Y., Rybalov M.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.nephrolog.ru/jour/article/view/1219">https://journal.nephrolog.ru/jour/article/view/1219</self-uri><abstract><p>ЦЕЛЬЮ данного исследования является оценка эффективности и информативной значимости ¹¹C-холин позитронно-эмиссионной томографии (ПЭТ) в диагностике местного рецидива рака предстательной железы (РПЖ) у больных после радиотерапии. ПАЦИЕНТЫ И МЕТОДЫ. В основу исследования положены результаты обследования и лечения 52 больных, обследованных в клинике урологии медицинского центра университета г. Гронинген (Нидерланды) после проведенной им радиотерапии по поводу гистологически подтвержденного рака простаты. Производили сравнение клинико-морфологических параметров у пациентов с признаками местного рецидива РПЖ после радиотерапии, обнаруженного с помощью ПЭТ, с гистопатоморфологическими результатами биопсии предстательной железы. РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ. По данным ПЭТ, местный рецидив был диагностирован у 42 больных: у 15 (36%) пациентов – одиночный рецидивный очаг новообразования, у 27 (64%) – «рассеянные» очаги. При этом совпадение данных ПЭТ с результатами биопсии простаты в диагностике рецидива имело место у 32 (76%) больных. Из остальных 10 пациентов: у трех больных были обнаружены отдаленные метастазы по данным ПЭТ, подтвержденные результатами компьютерной томографии и сцинтиграфии костей, двоим больным назначали гормональную терапию в связи с быстро прогрессирующей болезнью, пяти больным проведена локальная криотерапия, на фоне которой было отмечено снижение уровня простатоспецифического антигена (ПСА) в плазме крови. В целом, с помощью ПЭТ морфологически подтвержденный местный рецидив рака простаты удалось обнаружить у 37 из 42 (88%) пациентов. Совпадение результатов ПЭТ с результатами биопсии в отношении локализации рецидива было отмечено у 7 из 15 (47%) больных, у которых выявляли односторонний (в одной доле простаты) рецидив РПЖ, и у 11 из 27 (41%) – при двустороннем опухолевом процессе (в обеих долях). ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЕ. Применение ¹¹C-холин ПЭТ позволяет в большинстве случаев выявлять местный рецидив РПЖ у больных, перенесших радиотерапию. Однако точность данного метода в определении распространенности очагов рецидивных новообразований РПЖ недостаточна, достоверные данные могут быть получены только с использованием биопсии предстательной железы.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>THE AIM of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and informative value ¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography (PET) in diagnosis of local recurrence of prostate cancer (PC) in patients after radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS. The research is based on the results of the survey and treatment of 52 patients examined in the clinic Urology Medical Center, University of Groningen (Netherlands) following radiotherapy at the hystologicaly confirmed prostate cancer. The comparison was made between the clinical and morphological parameters in patients with signs of local recurrence after radiotherapy of prostate cancer detected by PET, with hystopatomorfologicheskimi results of a biopsy of the prostate. RESULTS. According to PET, local recurrence was diagnosed in 42 patients: in 15 (36%) patients – a single focus of recurrent tumor, in 27 (64%) – «scattered» hot spots. This coincidence PET findings with the results of prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of recurrence occurred in 32 (76%) patients. Of the remaining 10 patients: three patients had distant metastases according to PET, confirmed by the results of computed tomography and bone scintigraphy, two of the patients had hormone therapy in connection with rapidly progressive disease, five patients underwent local cryotherapy, were was observed reduction in prostate antigen (PSA) in blood plasma. In general, using PET morphologically confirmed local recurrence of prostate cancer was detected in 37 out of 42 (88%) patients. The coincidence of the results of PET and biopsy results with regard to the localization of recurrence was noted in 7 of 15 (47%) patients who had revealed a unilateral (one share of the prostate), prostate cancer recurrence, and in 11 out of 27 (41%) – with bilateral neoplastic process ( in both lobes). CONCLUSION. Application of ¹¹C-choline PET in most cases to identify local recurrence of prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. However, the accuracy of this method in determining the prevalence of foci of recurrent tumors of prostate cancer is insufficient reliable data can be obtained only by using a biopsy of the prostate.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак предстательной железы</kwd><kwd>диагностика</kwd><kwd>¹¹С-холин позитронно-эмиссионная томография</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>prostate cancer</kwd><kwd>diagnosis</kwd><kwd>¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58(2):71-96</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58(2):71-96</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zagars GK, Pollack A, von Eschenbach AC. Prognostic factors for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Analysis of 938 patients irradiated in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer 1997; 79:1370–1380</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zagars GK, Pollack A, von Eschenbach AC. Prognostic factors for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Analysis of 938 patients irradiated in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer 1997; 79:1370–1380</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zietman AL, Coen JJ, Dallow KC, Shipley WU. The treatment of prostate cancer by conventional radiation therapy: an analysis of long-term outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 32:287–292</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zietman AL, Coen JJ, Dallow KC, Shipley WU. The treatment of prostate cancer by conventional radiation therapy: an analysis of long-term outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 32:287–292</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zagars GK. Prostate specific antigen as an outcome variable for T1 and T2 prostate cancer treated by radiation therapy. J Urol 1994; 152 (5 Pt 2):1786-1791</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zagars GK. Prostate specific antigen as an outcome variable for T1 and T2 prostate cancer treated by radiation therapy. J Urol 1994; 152 (5 Pt 2):1786-1791</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ahmed HU, Pendse D, Illing R, Allen C, van der Meulen JH, Emberton M. Will focal therapy become a standard of care for men with localized prostate cancer? Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2007; 4(11):632-642</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ahmed HU, Pendse D, Illing R, Allen C, van der Meulen JH, Emberton M. Will focal therapy become a standard of care for men with localized prostate cancer? Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2007; 4(11):632-642</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kane CJ, Amling CL, Johnstone PA, Pak N, Lance RS, Thrasher JB, Foley JP, Riffenburgh RH, Moul JW. Limited value of bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in assessing biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2003; 61:607-611</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kane CJ, Amling CL, Johnstone PA, Pak N, Lance RS, Thrasher JB, Foley JP, Riffenburgh RH, Moul JW. Limited value of bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in assessing biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2003; 61:607-611</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Picchio M, Messa C, Landoni C et al. Value of 11 C choline-positron emission tomography for restaging prostate cancer: a comparison with 18F fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. J Urol 2003; 169: 1337-1340</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Picchio M, Messa C, Landoni C et al. Value of 11 C choline-positron emission tomography for restaging prostate cancer: a comparison with 18F fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. J Urol 2003; 169: 1337-1340</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">De Jong IJ, Pruim J, Elsinga PH, Vaalburg W, Mensink HJ. 11 C-choline positron emission tomography for the evaluation after treatment of localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2003; 44:32-38</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">De Jong IJ, Pruim J, Elsinga PH, Vaalburg W, Mensink HJ. 11 C-choline positron emission tomography for the evaluation after treatment of localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2003; 44:32-38</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rinnab L, Mottaghy FM, Blumstein NM, Reske SN, Hautmann RE, Hohl K et al. Evaluation of [11 C]-choline positron-emission/computed tomography in patients with increasing prostate-specific antigen levels after primary treatment for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2007; 100(4):786-793</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rinnab L, Mottaghy FM, Blumstein NM, Reske SN, Hautmann RE, Hohl K et al. Evaluation of [11 C]-choline positron-emission/computed tomography in patients with increasing prostate-specific antigen levels after primary treatment for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2007; 100(4):786-793</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krause BJ, Souvatzoglou M, Tuncel M, Herrmann K, Buck AK, Praus C et al. The detection rate of [(11) C] choline- PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008; 35(1):18-23</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krause BJ, Souvatzoglou M, Tuncel M, Herrmann K, Buck AK, Praus C et al. The detection rate of [(11) C] choline- PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008; 35(1):18-23</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Farsad M, Schiavina R, Franceschelli A, Sanguedolce F, Castellucci P, Bertaccini A, Brunocilla E, Manferrari F, Concetti S, Garofalo M, Rocca C, Borghesi M, Franchi R, Fanti S, Nanni C, Martorana G. Positron-emission tomography in imaging and staging prostate cancer. Cancer Biomark 2008; 4(4-5):277-284</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Farsad M, Schiavina R, Franceschelli A, Sanguedolce F, Castellucci P, Bertaccini A, Brunocilla E, Manferrari F, Concetti S, Garofalo M, Rocca C, Borghesi M, Franchi R, Fanti S, Nanni C, Martorana G. Positron-emission tomography in imaging and staging prostate cancer. Cancer Biomark 2008; 4(4-5):277-284</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Breeuwsma AJ, Leliveld AM, Pruim J, Van Den Bergh ACM, Dierckx RA, Nijman JM, De Jong IJ. Detection of local, regional and distant recurrence in patients with PSA relapse after external beam radiotherapy using 11C-choline positron emission tomography (PET). Eur Urol 2009 Mar; 8(4, Suppl):322</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Breeuwsma AJ, Leliveld AM, Pruim J, Van Den Bergh ACM, Dierckx RA, Nijman JM, De Jong IJ. Detection of local, regional and distant recurrence in patients with PSA relapse after external beam radiotherapy using 11C-choline positron emission tomography (PET). Eur Urol 2009 Mar; 8(4, Suppl):322</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hara T. 11C-choline and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose in tumor imaging with positron emission tomography. Mol Imaging Biol 2002; 4: 267-273</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hara T. 11C-choline and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose in tumor imaging with positron emission tomography. Mol Imaging Biol 2002; 4: 267-273</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schilling D, Schlemmer HP, Wagner PH, Bцttcher P, Merseburger AS, Aschoff P, Bares R, Pfannenberg C, Ganswindt U, Corvin S, Stenzl A. Histological verification of 11C-choline-positron emission/computed tomography-positive lymph nodes in patients with biochemical failure after treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2008; 102(4):446-451</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schilling D, Schlemmer HP, Wagner PH, Bцttcher P, Merseburger AS, Aschoff P, Bares R, Pfannenberg C, Ganswindt U, Corvin S, Stenzl A. Histological verification of 11C-choline-positron emission/computed tomography-positive lymph nodes in patients with biochemical failure after treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2008; 102(4):446-451</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cimitan M, Bortolus R, Morassut S, Canzonieri V, Garbeglio A, Baresic T, Borsatti E, Drigo A, Trovт MG. [18F] fluorocholine PET/CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse: experience in 100 consecutive patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006; 33(12):1387-1398</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cimitan M, Bortolus R, Morassut S, Canzonieri V, Garbeglio A, Baresic T, Borsatti E, Drigo A, Trovт MG. [18F] fluorocholine PET/CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse: experience in 100 consecutive patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006; 33(12):1387-1398</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Haider MA, Chung P, Sweet J, Toi A, Jhaveri K, Menard C, Warde P, Trachtenberg J, Lockwood G, Milosevic M. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for localization of recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70(2):425-430</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Haider MA, Chung P, Sweet J, Toi A, Jhaveri K, Menard C, Warde P, Trachtenberg J, Lockwood G, Milosevic M. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for localization of recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70(2):425-430</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Farsad M, Schiavina R, Castellucci P. Detection and localization of Prostate cancer: correlation of (11) C-choline PET/CT with histopathologic step-section analysis. J Nucl Med 2005; 46(10):1642-1649</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Farsad M, Schiavina R, Castellucci P. Detection and localization of Prostate cancer: correlation of (11) C-choline PET/CT with histopathologic step-section analysis. J Nucl Med 2005; 46(10):1642-1649</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Crawford ED, Wilson SS, Torkko KC, et al. Clinical staging of prostate cancer: A computer-simulated study of transperineal prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2005; 96(7): 999-1004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Crawford ED, Wilson SS, Torkko KC, et al. Clinical staging of prostate cancer: A computer-simulated study of transperineal prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2005; 96(7): 999-1004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Onik G, Barzell W. Transperineal 3D mapping biopsy of the prostate: an essential tool in selecting patients for focal prostate cancer therapy. Urol Onco 2008; 26(5):506-1010</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Onik G, Barzell W. Transperineal 3D mapping biopsy of the prostate: an essential tool in selecting patients for focal prostate cancer therapy. Urol Onco 2008; 26(5):506-1010</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chiong E, Andino L, Guo CC, Prokhorova IN, Goh JJK, Pisters LL, Troncoso P. Pathologic features of salvage radical prostatectomy specimens following radiotherapy: implications for focal therapeutic options. J Urol 2009; 181(4) [Suppl 1]:458</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chiong E, Andino L, Guo CC, Prokhorova IN, Goh JJK, Pisters LL, Troncoso P. Pathologic features of salvage radical prostatectomy specimens following radiotherapy: implications for focal therapeutic options. J Urol 2009; 181(4) [Suppl 1]:458</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Heidenreich A, Semrau R, Thuer D, Pfister D. Radical salvage prostatectomy: Treatment of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Urology 2008; 47(11):1441-1446</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Heidenreich A, Semrau R, Thuer D, Pfister D. Radical salvage prostatectomy: Treatment of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Urology 2008; 47(11):1441-1446</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ohlmann C, Pfister D, Thuer D et al. 11-C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Compute-rized Tomography for tumor localization of locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy. Eur Urol 2007; 6(2): 229</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ohlmann C, Pfister D, Thuer D et al. 11-C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Compute-rized Tomography for tumor localization of locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy. Eur Urol 2007; 6(2): 229</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hautmann RE. Salvage radical prostatectomy. Urology 2006; 45(10):1260-1265</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hautmann RE. Salvage radical prostatectomy. Urology 2006; 45(10):1260-1265</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
