nefrНефрологияNephrology (Saint-Petersburg)1561-62742541-9439Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University10.24884/1561-6274-2010-14-4-81-88nefr-1249Research ArticleМЕТОДИЧЕСКИЕ СООБЩЕНИЯТЕХНОЛОГИЧЕСКОЕ ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЕ ВЕРИФИКАЦИИ МОЧЕВОГО СИНДРОМАTECHNOLOGICAL SUPPORT OF URINARY SYNDROME VERIFICATIONЭмануэльВ. Л.EmanuelV. L.

кафедра клинической лабораторной диагностики 

197022, Санкт-Петербург, ул. Л.Толстого, д. 6/8, СПбГМУ им. акад. И.П. Павлова.

logoped-vv@yandex.ruКнязеваЕ. С.KnyazevaE. S.Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет им. акад. И.П. ПавловаRussian FederationSysmex Europe GmbH, г. ГамбургGermany2010100420101448188Copyright © Эмануэль В.Л., Князева Е.С., 20102010Эмануэль В.Л., Князева Е.С.Emanuel V.L., Knyazeva E.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://journal.nephrolog.ru/jour/article/view/1249

В статье анализируются современные технологические методы верификации мочевого синдрома в условиях скрининговых исследований. Приводятся материалы по применяемым лабораторным методам, используемым при выполнении «общего анализа мочи» в клинико-диагностических лабораториях учреждений здравоохранения России и результаты этих исследований.

Authors review modern screening methods of urinary syndrome verification. Methods used in Russian clinical laboratories for «general urine test» as well as results of these tests are considered.

анализ мочихимический составмикроскопия осадкамочевой синдромошибки диагностикипроточная цитометрияurinanalysisurinary syndromediagnostic mistakesurine sediment microscopyurine flow cytometryReferencesKouri T, Fogazzi G,Gant V, Hallander H, Hofmann W, Guder WG, eds. European Urinalysis Guidelines. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2000;60[supl.60]:S1-S96Kouri T, Fogazzi G,Gant V, Hallander H, Hofmann W, Guder WG, eds. European Urinalysis Guidelines. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2000;60[supl.60]:S1-S96Diven SC, Travis LB. A practical primary care approach to hematuria in children. Pediatric Nephrol 2000; 14:65–72Diven SC, Travis LB. A practical primary care approach to hematuria in children. Pediatric Nephrol 2000; 14:65–72Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf JS et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy—part I: definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology. Urology 2001;57:599-603Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf JS et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy—part I: definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology. Urology 2001;57:599-603Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf JS Jr et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy—part II: patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up. Urology 2001;57:604-610Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf JS Jr et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy—part II: patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up. Urology 2001;57:604-610Smith P, Morris A, Reller LB. Predicting urine culture results by dipstick testing and phase contrast microscopy. Pathology 2003;35:161-165Smith P, Morris A, Reller LB. Predicting urine culture results by dipstick testing and phase contrast microscopy. Pathology 2003;35:161-165Смойер ВЕ. Гематурия. В: Шейман ДА, ред. Патофизиология почки. Бином, М, 1997; 138-154Смойер ВЕ. Гематурия. В: Шейман ДА, ред. Патофизиология почки. Бином, М, 1997; 138-154Hannemann-Pohl K, Kampf SC. Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture. Clin Chem Lab Med 1999; 37(7):753-764Hannemann-Pohl K, Kampf SC. Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture. Clin Chem Lab Med 1999; 37(7):753-764Ishii T, Hara T, Nakayama A, Matsumoto H. Examination of remaining cells by UF-100 in the supernatant after centrifugation Sysmex. J Intern 2003; 13(1):65-70Ishii T, Hara T, Nakayama A, Matsumoto H. Examination of remaining cells by UF-100 in the supernatant after centrifugation Sysmex. J Intern 2003; 13(1):65-70Takahashi M. Atlas of urine sediment. Uchido-Yagi-shoten, 2003Takahashi M. Atlas of urine sediment. Uchido-Yagi-shoten, 2003Burke JR. Urinary tract infections: investigation in young children. Medicine Today 2003; 4: 69–76.Burke JR. Urinary tract infections: investigation in young children. Medicine Today 2003; 4: 69–76.Leman P. Validity of urinalysis and microscopy for detecting urinary tract infection in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 2002;9:141-147Leman P. Validity of urinalysis and microscopy for detecting urinary tract infection in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 2002;9:141-147Lifshitz E, Kramer L. Outpatient urine culture: does collection technique matter? Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:2537-2540Lifshitz E, Kramer L. Outpatient urine culture: does collection technique matter? Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:2537-2540Delanghe JR, Kouri TT, Huber AR et al. The role of automated urine particle flow cytometry in clinical practice. Clin Chim Acta 2000; 301(1-2):1-18Delanghe JR, Kouri TT, Huber AR et al. The role of automated urine particle flow cytometry in clinical practice. Clin Chim Acta 2000; 301(1-2):1-18Roggeman S, Zaman Z. Safely reducing manual urine microscopy analyses by combining urine flow cytometer and strip results. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116(6):872-878Roggeman S, Zaman Z. Safely reducing manual urine microscopy analyses by combining urine flow cytometer and strip results. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116(6):872-878Gessoni G. Valverde S, Maturi P et al. Diagnosis of acute urinary tract infections using Sysmex UF-100. Sysmex J Int 2004;14: 18-22Gessoni G. Valverde S, Maturi P et al. Diagnosis of acute urinary tract infections using Sysmex UF-100. Sysmex J Int 2004;14: 18-22Wang J, Zhang Y, Xu D, Shao W, Lu Y et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol 2010; 133(4): 577-582Wang J, Zhang Y, Xu D, Shao W, Lu Y et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol 2010; 133(4): 577-582De Rosa R. Grosso S, Bruschetta G et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF1000i flow cytometer for ruling out bacterial urinary tract infection. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411(15-16):1137-1142De Rosa R. Grosso S, Bruschetta G et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF1000i flow cytometer for ruling out bacterial urinary tract infection. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411(15-16):1137-1142Manoni F, Valverde S, Antico F et al. Field evaluation of a second-generation cytometer UF-100 in diagnosis of acute urinary tract infections in adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002;8(10):662-668Manoni F, Valverde S, Antico F et al. Field evaluation of a second-generation cytometer UF-100 in diagnosis of acute urinary tract infections in adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002;8(10):662-668Evans R, Davidson MM, Sim LR, Hay AJ. Testing by Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and with bacterial culture in a diagnostic laboratory: a comparison. J Clin Pathol 2006, 59(6):661-662Evans R, Davidson MM, Sim LR, Hay AJ. Testing by Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and with bacterial culture in a diagnostic laboratory: a comparison. J Clin Pathol 2006, 59(6):661-662Kim SY, Kim YJ, Lee SM et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 urine cell analyzer as a screening test to reduce the need for urine cultures for community-acquired urine tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol 2007; 128(6): 922-925Kim SY, Kim YJ, Lee SM et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 urine cell analyzer as a screening test to reduce the need for urine cultures for community-acquired urine tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol 2007; 128(6): 922-925Mehta K, et al «Urinary red cell morphology to detect site of hematuria». Indian Pediatr 1994 Sep;31(9):1039-1045Mehta K, et al «Urinary red cell morphology to detect site of hematuria». Indian Pediatr 1994 Sep;31(9):1039-1045Docci D, Delvecchio C, Turci A et al. Detection of glomerular bleeding by urinary-red-cell-size distribution. Nephron 1988;50(4):380-382Docci D, Delvecchio C, Turci A et al. Detection of glomerular bleeding by urinary-red-cell-size distribution. Nephron 1988;50(4):380-382Hyodo T, Kumano K, Haga M, Sakai T et al. Detection of glomerular and non-glomerular red blood cells by authometed urinary sediment analyzer. Jpn J Nephrol 1995; 37:35-43Hyodo T, Kumano K, Haga M, Sakai T et al. Detection of glomerular and non-glomerular red blood cells by authometed urinary sediment analyzer. Jpn J Nephrol 1995; 37:35-43Apelanld T, Mestad O, Hetland O. Assessment of haematuria: automated urine flowmetry vs microscop. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16:1615-1619Apelanld T, Mestad O, Hetland O. Assessment of haematuria: automated urine flowmetry vs microscop. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16:1615-1619

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.