DISURIA AFTER OPERATIVE THERAPY OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA
https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2012-16-4-88-93
Abstract
THE AIM OF STUDY: to evaluate the reasons of persisting dysuria after operative treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: complex urological examination, including urodynamic study, were performed at 73 patients (middle age 63,4±1,2 years) with disuria after operative treatment BPH. Disease duration was 3,4±0,5 years. Control group consists of 36 BPH patient with absence of dysuria after operative treatment of BPH. Middle age of patients in the control group was 64,1±1,2 years. RESULTS: Persisting dysuria after surgery at patients with poor results of BPH treatment commonly was caused by detrusor pathology: detrusor hyperactivity and impaired contractility. These conditions were diagnosed at 46 (63,0%) and at 26 (35,6%) patients. Based on results of urodynamic study at 19 (26%) patients was diagnosed both detrusor hyperactivity and impaired contractility. Less frequent reason for persisting dysuria was infravesical obstruction diagnosed at 9 (12,3%) patients. Based on results urodynamic study at 5 incontinence patients was diagnosed stress urinary incontinence due to sphincter impairment and at 16 patients mixed incontinence was found out due to detrusor dysfunction and sphincter impairment. CONCLUSION: Urodynamic examination of patients with poor results of operative treatment BPH allowed to define reason of dysuria, including incontinence. At majority patient persisting dysuria was caused by detrusor hyperactivity or/and impaired detrusor contractility.
About the Authors
S.H. Al-ShukriRussian Federation
T. G. Giorgobiani
Russian Federation
R. E. Amdiy
Russian Federation
References
1. Kuo H.C. Analysis of the pathophysiology of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients after prostatectomy. Urol Int 2002; 68 (2): 99-104
2. Tanaka Y, Masumori N, Itoh N. et al. Symptomatic and urodynamic improvement by oral distigmine bromide in poor voiders after transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology 2001; 57 (2): 270-274
3. Zhang P, Gao J. Wu Z. Urodynamic analysis of nonimprovement after prostatectomy. Chin Med J 2002; 115 (7): 1093-1095
4. Лоран ОБ, Вишневский АЕ, Секамова СМ. Ультраструктурные исследования детрузора у больных с доброкачественной гиперплазией предстательной железы. Урология и нефрология 1996; (4): 27-31
5. Chapple CR, Smith D. The pathophysiological changes in the bladder obstructed by benign prostatic hyperplasia. B J U 1994; (73): 117-123
6. Parekh A.R, Feng M.I, Kirages D. et al. The role of pelvic floor execises on post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol 2003; 170 (1): 130-133
7. Shaheen A, Quinlan D. Feasibility of open simple prostatectomy with early vascular control . B J U Int 2004; 93 (3): 349-352
8. Teunissen TAM, de Jonge A, van Weel C. et al. Treating urinary incontinence in the elderly – conservatives measures that work: a systematic review. J Fam Pract 2004; 53 (1): 21-28
9. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodynam 2002; 21(2): 167-178
10. Shafer W. Basic principles and clinical application of advanced analysis of bladder voiding function. Urol Clin North Am 1990; 17 (2) : 553-566
11. Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2002; 21 (1) : 261-274
12. Abrams P. Bladder outlet obstruction index, blader contractility index and bladder voiding efficiency: three simple indices to define bladder voiding function. B J U Int 1999; (84): 745-750
Review
For citations:
Al-Shukri S., Giorgobiani T.G., Amdiy R.E. DISURIA AFTER OPERATIVE THERAPY OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2012;16(4):88-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2012-16-4-88-93