РОЛЬ ПРОСТАТОСПЕЦИФИЧЕСКОГО АНТИГЕНА И ЕГО КИНЕТИЧЕСКИХ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИК ПРИ ОТБОРЕ БОЛЬНЫХ ДЛЯ КОНТРОЛЬНОЙ 11C-ХОЛИН ПОЗИТРОННО-ЭМИССИОННОЙ/ КОМПЬЮТЕРНОЙ ТОМОГРАФИИ ПОСЛЕ РАДИОТЕРАПИИ ИЛИ РАДИКАЛЬНОЙ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИИ
https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2011-15-4-55-61
Аннотация
Об авторах
М. А. РЫБАЛОВНидерланды
Кафедра урологии
И. Я. ДЕ ЙОНГ
Нидерланды
Кафедра урологии
А. Й. БРЕУСМА
Нидерланды
Кафедра урологии
С. Х. АЛЬ-ШУКРИ
Россия
кафедра урологии
С. Ю. БОРОВЕЦ
Россия
кафедра урологии
Список литературы
1. Han M., Partin A.W., Pound C.R., Epstein J.I., Walsh P.C. Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 555-565
2. Zagars G.K. Prostate specific antigen as an outcome variable for T1 and T2 prostate cancer treated by radiation therapy. J. Urol 1994; 152: 1786-1791
3. Breeuwsma A.J., Pruim J., Van Den Bergh A.C.M. et al. Detection of local, regional and distant recurrence in patients with PSA relapse after external beam radiotherapy using 11C-choline positron emission tomography. Int J. Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 77: 160-164
4. Maffezzini M., Bossi A., Collette L. Implications of prostate-specific antigen doubling time as indicator of failure after surgery or radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 605-613
5. Palma D., Tyldesley S., Pickles T. Prostate Cohort Outcomes Initiative. Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen velocity is associated with development of distant metastases and prostate Cancer mortality in men treated with radiotherapy and androgen-deprivation therapy. Cancer 2008; 112: 1941-1948
6. Petit J.H., Chen M.H., Loffredo M., Sussman B., Renshaw A.A., D'Amico A.V. Prostate-specific antigen recurrence and mortality after conventional dose radiation therapy in select men with low-risk prostate Cancer. Cancer 2006; 107: 2180-2185
7. Castellucci P., Fuccio C., Nanni C. et al. Influence of trigger PSA and PSA kinetics on 11C-Choline PET/CT detection rate in patients with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy. J. Nucl Med 2009; 50: 1394-1400
8. Giovacchini G., Picchio M., Scattoni V. et al. PSA doubling time for prediction of [(11)C]choline PET/CT findings in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Eur J. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37: 1106-1116
9. Fitzpatrick J.M., Banu E., Oudard S. Prostate-specific antigen kinetics in localized and advanced prostate cancer. BJU Int 2009; 103: 578-587
10. Picchio M., Messa C., Landoni C. et al. Value of 11C choline-positron emission tomography for restaging prostate cancer: a comparison with 18F fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. J. Urol 2003; 169: 1337-1340
11. de Jong I.J., Pruim J., Elsinga P.H., Vaalburg W., Mensink H.J. 11C-choline positron emission tomography for the evaluation after treatment of localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 32-38
12. Rinnab L., Mottaghy F.M., Blumstein N.M. et al. Evaluation of "C-choline positron-emission/computed tomography in patients with increasing prostate-specific antigen levels after primary treatment for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2007; 100: 786793
13. Krause B.J., Souvatzoglou M., Tuncel M. et al. The detection rate of [(11)C]choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Eur J. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008; 35: 18-23
14. Tsukamoto E., Ochi S. PET/CT today: system and its impact on cancer diagnosis. Ann Nucl Med 2006; 20: 255-267
15. Townsend D.W. Dual-modality imaging: combining anatomy and function. J. Nucl Med 2008; 49: 938-955
16. Consensus statement. Guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. Int J. Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 37: 1035-1041
17. Hara T. 11C-choline and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose in tumor imaging with positron emission tomography. Mol Imaging Biol 2002; 4: 267-273
18. Schmid H.P., McNeal J.E., Stamey T.A. Observations on the doubling time of prostate Cancer. The use of serial prostate-specific antigen in patients with untreated disease as a measure of increasing Cancer volume. Cancer 1993; 71: 20312040
19. Connolly D., Black A., Murray L.J., Napolitano G., Gavin A., Keane P.F. Methods of calculating prostate-specific antigen velocity. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 1044-1051
20. Stamey T.A., Kabalin J.N., McNeal J.E. et al. Prostate specific antigen in the diagnosis and treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. II. Radical prostatectomy treated patients. J. Urol 1989; 141: 1076-1083
21. Stamey T.A., Johnstone I.M., McNeal J.E., Lu A.Y., Yemoto C.M. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen levels between 2 and 22 ng./ml. correlate poorly with post-radical prostatectomy cancer morphology: prostate specific antigen cure rates appear constant between 2 and 9 ng./ml. J. Urol 2002; 167: 103-111
22. de Jong I.J., Pruim J., Elsinga P.H., Vaalburg W., Mensink H.J. Preoperative staging of pelvic lymph nodes in prostate cancer by 11C-choline PET. J. Nucl Med 2003; 44: 331-335
23. Scattoni V., Picchio M., Suardi N. et al. Detection of lymph-node metastases with integrated [11C]choline PET/CT in patients with PSA failure after radical retropubic prostatectomy: results confirmed by open pelvic-retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 423-429
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
РЫБАЛОВ М.А., ДЕ ЙОНГ И.Я., БРЕУСМА А.Й., АЛЬ-ШУКРИ С.Х., БОРОВЕЦ С.Ю. РОЛЬ ПРОСТАТОСПЕЦИФИЧЕСКОГО АНТИГЕНА И ЕГО КИНЕТИЧЕСКИХ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИК ПРИ ОТБОРЕ БОЛЬНЫХ ДЛЯ КОНТРОЛЬНОЙ 11C-ХОЛИН ПОЗИТРОННО-ЭМИССИОННОЙ/ КОМПЬЮТЕРНОЙ ТОМОГРАФИИ ПОСЛЕ РАДИОТЕРАПИИ ИЛИ РАДИКАЛЬНОЙ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИИ. Нефрология. 2011;15(4):55-61. https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2011-15-4-55-61
For citation:
RYBALOV M.A., De YONG I.Ya., BREUSMA A.J., AL-SHUKRI S.H., BOROVETS S.Yu. ROLE OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND ITS KINETIC CHARACTERISTICS AT PАTIENT SELECTION FOR CONTROL 11C-CHOLIN POSITRON-EMISSION/COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY AFTER RADIOTHERAPY AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2011;15(4):55-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2011-15-4-55-61