ON THE MECHANISM OF TOXIC EFFECT OF DOXORUBICIN ON THE KIDNEYS
https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2006-10-4-72-76
Abstract
THE AIM of the investigation was to specify effects of doxorubicin (DOX) on renal cells using eukaryotic model Saccharomyces cerevisiae since the mechanisms of toxic effects of DOX on the kidneys still remain obscure. MATREIALS AND METHODS. The investigation was performed with strain S.cerevisiae YPH499. Incubation of the cells with different concentrations of DOX lasted 24 hours. The degree of injury of DNA was evaluated by activity of the ribonucleotide reductase -3 (RNR3). The concentration of reduced glutathione (G[1]SH), oxidized glutation (G-SSG), contents of malonic dialdehyde (MDA) were determined. RESULTS. DOX caused a decrease of cell proliferation, resulted in growing concentration of G-SH and so a reliable growth of the concentration of G[1]SSG was noted, but in less degree. In control experiments the ratio G-SH/G-SSG was 7.33±0.28 while in experiments with 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mkM DOX the ratio G-SH/G-SSG was 7.52± 1.08 (p>0.05); 5.51±0.46 (p<0.01); 6.38±2.39 (p>0.05); 5.19±0.63 (p<0.01) and 5.05±0.70 (p<0.01) respectively. DOX induced expression of gene RNR3. The content of malonic dialdehyde did not substantially change. CONCLUSION. During the incubation of S.cerevisiae in the medium containing DOX and glucose an increase of G-SH due to expression of gene RNR3 compensates the redundant formation of free radicals and does not lead to free-radical damage of biomolecules. In the kidneys of animals administration of DOX fails to provide a sufficient concentration of G-SH and under these conditions free radicals induce oxidative stress at the expense of redox of cyclic reactions of DOX.
About the Authors
Yu. V. SaenkoRussian Federation
A. M. Shutov
Russian Federation
R. Kh. Musina
Russian Federation
References
1. Gewirts DA. A critical evaluation of the mechanisms of action proposed for the antitumor effects of the anthracycline antibiotics adriamycin and daunorubicin. Biochem Pharmacol 1999;57:727-741
2. Саенко ЮВ, Шутов АМ, Напалкова СМ, Селиванова ОС. Эритропоэтин снижает проявления оксидативного стресса, индуцированного доксорубицином, в почках крыс. Нефрология 2005;9(2):96-100
3. Lu SC. Regulation of hepatic glutathione synthesis: current concepts and controversies. FASEB J 1999;13:1169-1183
4. Pinkus R, Weiner LM, Daniel V. Role of quinine-mediated generation of hydroxyl radicals in the induction of glutathione S-transferase gene expression. Biochemistry 1995;34: 81-88
5. Doroshow JH, Synold TW, Somlo G et al. Oxidative DNA base modifications in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients treated with high-dose infusion doxorubicin. Blood 2001; 97:2839–2845
6. Elledge SJ, Davis RW. Two genes differentially regulated in the cell cycle and by DNA-damaging agents encode alternative regulatory subunits of ribonucleotide reductase. Genes Dev 1990; 4:740–751
7. Miranda-Vizuete A, Rodri’guez-Ariza A, Toribio F, et al. The levels of ribonucleotide reductase, thioredoxin, glutaredoxin 1, and GSH are balanced in Escherichia coli K12. J Biol Chem 1996;271(32):19099–19103
8. Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey B et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 1996;274: 546–567
9. Buschini A, Poli P, Rossi C. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as an eukaryotic cell model to assess cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of three anticancer anthraquinones. Mutagenesis 2003;18:26-36
10. Berlin V, Brill JA, Trueheart J et al. Genetic screens and selections for cell and nuclear fusion mutants. Methods in Enzymology 1991;194:774-792
11. Gietz RD, Woods RA. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods in Enzymology 2002;350: 87-96
12. Jia X, Xiao W. Compromised DNA repair enhances sensitivity of the yeast RNR3-LacZgenotoxicity testing system. Toxicological Science 2003;75:82-88
13. Guarente L. Yeast promoters and lacZ fusions designed to study expression of cloned genes in yeast. Methods Enzymol 1983;101:181–191
14. Baker MA, Cerniglia GJ, Zaman A. Microtiter plate assay for the measurement of glutathione and glutathione disulfide in large numbers of biological samples. Anal Biochem 1990;190:360-365
15. Jefferies H, Coster J, Khalil A et al. Glutathione ANZ. J Surg 2003;73:517-522
16. Kannan K, Jain SK. Oxidative stress and apoptosis. Pathophysiology 2000;7:153-163
17. Martinez-Salvado C, Eleno N, Morales AI et al. Gentamicin treatment induced simultaneous mesangial proliferation and apoptosis in rats. Kidney Int 2004:65:2161-2171
18. Rincon J, Romero M, Viera N et al. Increased oxidative stress and apoptosis in acute puromycin aminonucleoside nephrosis. Int J Exp Path 2004;85:25-33
19. Liu QY, Tan BK. Relationship between anti-oxidant activities and doxorubicin-induced lipid peroxidation in P388 tumour cells and heart and liver and mice. Clinical and experimental pharmacology and Physiology 2003;30:185-188
20. Liu QY, Tan BK. Dietary fish oil and vitamin E enhance doxorubicin effects in P388 tumor-bearing mice. Lipids 2002;37:549-556
21. Doroshow JH, Locker GY, Myers CE. Enzymatic defenses of the mouse heart against reactive oxygen metabolites: Alterations produced by doxorubicin. J Clin Invest 1980; 65:128-135
22. Powis G. Free radical formation by antitumor quinones. Free Rad Biol Med 1989;6:63-101
23. Toubeau G, Laurent G, Carlier MB et al.Tissue repair in rat kidney cortex after short treatment with aminoglycosides at low doses. Lab invest 1986;54:385-393
24. Arner ESJ, Holmgren A. Physiological functions of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase. Eur J Biochem 2000; 267:6102-6109
25. Schafer QF, Buettiner GR. Redox environment of the cell as viewed through the redox state of the glutathione disulfide/ glutathione couple. Free Rad Biol Med 2001;30: 1191-1212
26. Klatt P, Lamas S. Regulation of protein function by S-glutathiolation in response to oxidative stress. Eur J Biochem 2000;267:4928-4944
Review
For citations:
Saenko Yu.V., Shutov A.M., Musina R.Kh. ON THE MECHANISM OF TOXIC EFFECT OF DOXORUBICIN ON THE KIDNEYS. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2006;10(4):72-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2006-10-4-72-76