Preview

Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg)

Advanced search

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF RISK FACTORS FOR CAROTID ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES COMPLICATED WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

Abstract

THE AIM: to assess the additive effects of dyslipidemia, hypertension and decreased GFR (<60 ml/min/1.73m2) on the characteristics of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes (DT2) and CKD stages 1-3. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We investigated 100 patients with DT2 and CKD stages 1-3 aged 56.54±12.17 years. Control group included 26 healthy subjects of the same age. Total plaque area (TPA) was calculated as the sum of all plaque areas. GFR was estimated by CKI-EPI equation. RESULTS. We divided patients with DT2 and CKD into 3 groups: group 1 (n=26) - without additional risk factors for atherosclerosis, group 2 (n=28) - with 1 additional risk factor and group 3 (n=46) - with 2-3 additional risk factors. The prevalence of carotid atherosclerotic plaques was 8% in group 1, 21% in group 2 and 28% in group 3 (p<0.05). We found a significant difference in IMT between left and right carotid artery (0.70±0.16 mm versus 0.66±0.13 mm, p<0.001, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in carotid IMT between patients with plagues and without them (p=0.171). CONCLUSION. The results of the study suggest that dyslipidemia, hypertension and decreased GFR have additive effects on the development of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with DT2 and CKD stages 1-3.

About the Authors

Olha N. Vasilkova
Гомельский государственный медицинский университет
Russian Federation


Tatiana V. Mokhort
Белорусский государственный медицинский университет
Russian Federation


Elena P. Naumenko
Республиканский научно-практический центр радиационной медицины и экологии человека
Russian Federation


Ivan Yu. Pchelin
Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет
Russian Federation


Natalia V. Hudiakova
Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет
Russian Federation


References

1. WHO Factsheet No. 317. http://who.int/mediacentre/ factsheets/fs317/en Accessed September 18, 2010)

2. Beckman JA, Creager MA, Libby P. Diabetes and atherosclerosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. JAMA 2002; 287 (19): 2570-2581

3. Giannarelli C, Bianchini E, Bruno RM et al. Local carotid stiffness and intima-media thickness assessment by a novel ultrasound-based system in essential hypertension. Atherosclerosis 2012; 223 (2): 372-377

4. Matsumoto K, SeraY Nakamura H et al. Correlation between common carotid arterial wall thickness and ischemic stroke in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 2002; 51 (2): 244-247

5. Baldassarre D, Amato M, Bondioli A et al. Carotid artery intima-media thickness measured by ultrasonography in normal clinical practice correlates well with atherosclerosis risk factors. Stroke 2000; 31 (10): 2426-2430

6. Zhang L, Zhao F, Yang Y et al. Association between carotid artery intima-media thickness and early-stage CKD in a Chinese population. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 49 (6): 786-792

7. Tripathi BK, Srivastava AK. Diabetes mellitus: complications and therapeutics. Med Sci Monit 2006; 12 (7): RA130-RA147

8. Coresh J, Astor BC, Greene T et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis 2003 41 (1): 1-12

9. Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Turcot D et al. Impact of chronic kidney disease on prognosis of patients with diabetes mellitus treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94 (3): 300-305

10. Virmani R, Avolio AP, Mergner WJ et al. Effect of aging on aortic morphology in populations with high and low prevalence of hypertension and atherosclerosis. Comparison between occidental and Chinese communities. Am J Pathol 1991; 139 (5): 1119-1129

11. Смирнов АВ, Петрищев НН, Мнускина ММ и др. Дисфункция эндотелия и апоптоз на ранних стадиях хронической болезни почек. Тер арх 2012; 84(6): 9-15

12. Spence JD. Ultrasound measurement of carotid plaque as a surrogate outcome for coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89 (4A): 10B-15B; discussion 15B-16B

13. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150 (9): 604-612

14. Carretero OA, Oparil S. Essential hypertension. Part I: definition and etiology. Circulation 2000; 101 (3): 329-335

15. Zhang L, Zhang WH, Zhang L, Wang PY Prevalence of over-weight/obesity and its associations with hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome: a survey in the suburban area of Beijing, 2007. Obes Facts 2011; 4 (4): 284-289

16. Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 2005 67 (6): 2089-2100

17. Смирнов АВ, Добронравов ВА, Кисина АА и др. Клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению диабетической нефропатии. Нефрология 2015; 19 (1): 67-77

18. Azen SP, Mack WJ, Cashin-Hemphill L et al. Progression of coronary artery disease predicts clinical coronary events. Long-term follow-up from the Cholesterol Lowering Atherosclerosis Study. Circulation 1996; 93 (1): 34-41

19. Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR et al. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987-1993. Am J Epidemiol 1997; 146 (6): 483-494

20. Khot UN, Khot MB, Bajzer CT et al. Prevalence of conventional risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease. JAMA 2003; 290 (7): 898-904

21. Lorenz MW, Markus HS, Bots ML et al. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2007; 115 (4): 459-467

22. Lorenz MW, Schaefer C, Steinmetz H, Sitzer M. Is carotid intima-media thickness useful for individual prediction of cardiovascular risk? Ten-year results from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS). Eur Heart J 2010; 31 (16): 2041-2048

23. Giannarelli C, Bianchini E, Bruno RM et al. Local carotid stiffness and intima-media thickness assessment by a novel ultrasound-based system in essential hypertension. Atherosclerosis 2012; 223 (2): 372-377

24. Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness consensus (2004-2006). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the III and IV watching the risk symposium, 13th and 15th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, and Brussels, Belgium, 2006. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23 (1): 75-80

25. Finn AV, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Correlation between carotid intimal/medial thickness and atherosclerosis: a point of view from pathology. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010; 30 (2): 177-181

26. Luo X, Yang Y Cao T, Li Z. Differences in left and right carotid intima-media thickness and the associated risk factors. Clin Radiol 2011; 66 (5): 393-398

27. Layton KF, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ et al. Bovine aortic arch variant in humans: clarification of a common misnomer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27 (7): 1541-1542

28. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999; 282 (21): 2035-2042

29. van der Meer IM, Iglesias del Sol A, Hak AE et al. Risk factors for progression of atherosclerosis measured at multiple sites in the arterial tree: the Rotterdam Study. Stroke 2003; 34 (10): 2374-2379


Review

For citations:


Vasilkova O.N., Mokhort T.V., Naumenko E.P., Pchelin I.Yu., Hudiakova N.V. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF RISK FACTORS FOR CAROTID ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES COMPLICATED WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2016;20(1):57-62. (In Russ.)

Views: 481


ISSN 1561-6274 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9439 (Online)