INDIVIDUALIZATION OF RENOPROTECTION IN DEPENDENCE FROM ESTIMATED GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE AND RENAL FUNCTIONAL RESERVE
https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2019-23-1-9-14
Abstract
Renoprotection – a system of measures primarily pharmacological control, contributing to the continued preservation of renal function. Any medical activity or medicines that lead to a slowdown, suspension or reversion of eGFR could be considered as renoprotective. Currently, renoprotective drugs with evidence-based efficacy include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and recently SGLT2 inhibitors. It is known that the therapeutic efficacy of renoprotective drugs depends on the initial eGFR. Hence, choosing renoprotection medicines, it is necessary to consider not only the estimated GFR (using the EPI formula), but also a functional renal reserve. Physiologically sound is the method of determining the renal reserve with oral administration of 0.45-0.50% sodium chloride solution at the rate of 0.5% of body weight. The definition of a renal reserve based on this technique, as a routine method for examining nephrological patients, provides additional information not only on the number of functioning nephrons, but also on their condition. Based on a retrospective analysis of more than 15 years of using ACEIs and studying the functional renal reserve, we proposed a differentiated approach to the appointment of renoprotective medicines in mono regime or drugs combination, taking into account the stage of the disease and the functional renal reserve for maximum preservation of functioning nephrons. This approach has been used by us for the past three years in clinical practice.
About the Authors
D. D. IvanovUkraine
Prof. Dmytro D.Ivanov, MD, PhD, DMedSci
604112 Ukraine, Kiev Dorogozhytska str, 9, Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Head of Nephrology and RRT Dep.; Phone: +380504448788
A. I. Gozhenko
Ukraine
Prof. Anatoly I. Gozhenko, MD, PhD, DMedSci
65000, Ukraine Odessa, Kanatnaya Street 92, Ukrainian Research Institute of Medicine of Transport of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Director; Phone: +380487225364
L. M. Savytska
Ukraine
Рostgraduate student Lyubov N. Savitskaya, MD
604053 Ukraine, Kiev, pr. Nesterovsky, 13/19, Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education; Dep Nephrology and RRT; Municipal policlinic of the Kiev Regional Council "Kiev Regional Hospital № 2"; Phone: +380636910895
References
1. Perico N, Codreanu I, Schieppati A et al. The future of renoprotection. Kidney Int Suppl 2005; 68:95–101. Doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09716.x
2. Duke G.J. Renal protective agents: a review. Crit Care Resusc1999;1(3):265–275
3. Bamgbola O. Review of vancomycin-induced renal toxicity: an update. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2016; 7(3):136–147. Doi:10.1177/2042018816638223
4. van Baar MJB, van Raalte DH, Muskiet MHA. GLP-1 receptor agonists, CKD, and eGFR trajectory. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6(10):764–765. Doi:10.101687(18)30241-9
5. Ratanasrimetha P, Quirich M, Phisitkul S. Renal functional reserve. The Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles 2018; 6(25):26–30. Doi: 10.12746/swrccc.v6i25.480
6. Schnaper HW. Remnant nephron physiology and the progression of chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol 2014; 29(2):193–202.Doi:10.1007/s00467-013-2494-8
7. Molitoris BA. Rethinking CKD Evaluation: Should We Be Quantifying Basal or Stimulated GFR to Maximize Precision and Sensitivity? Am J Kidney Dis 2017; 69(5):675–683. Doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.028
8. Gozhenko AI, Kravchuk OV, Nikitenko OP et al. Funkcional renal resrve. Odessa, 2015; 7–106
9. Andrianesis V, Glykofridi S, Doupis J. The renal effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and a mini-review of the literature. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2016; 7(5-6):212–228. Doi:10.1177/2042018816676239
10. Maack T. Role of atrial natriuretic factor in volume control. Kidney Int 1996; 49(6):1732–1737
11. Paterna S, Di Pasquale P, Parrinello G et al. Changes in brain natriuretic peptide levels and bioelectrical impedance measurements after treatment with high-dose furosemide and hypertonic saline solution versus high-dose furosemide alone in refractory congestive heart failure: a double-blind study. J Am Coll Cardio 2005;45(12):1997–2003. Doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.059
12. Ivanov DD, Gozhenko AI. Functional renal reserve. UMJ 2018; 3(1) (125):74–75
13. Gozhenko AI, Kravchuk AV, Sirman VM et al. Functional Renal Reserve: Physiological Value of Renal Reserve and Substantiation of the Method of Its Determination. Kidneys 2015; 4: 7–11
14. Schnermann J, Briggs JP. The macula densa is worth its salt. J Clin Invest 1999; 104(8):1007–1009. Doi:10.1172/jci8539
15. Rutkowski B, Tylicki L. Nephroprotective action of reninangiotensin-aldosterone system blockade in chronic kidney disease patients: the landscape after ALTITUDE and VA NEPHRON-D trails. J Ren Nutr 2015; 25(2):194–200. Doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2014.10.026
16. Ivanov DD. Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers and Renal Functional Reserve. Is There a Limit of Renoprotection? Kidneys 2015; 4 (14):12–15
17. Messerli FH, Bangalore S, Bavishi C et al. AngiotensinConverting Enzyme Inhibitors in Hypertension To Use or Not to Use? J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71(13):1474–1482. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.058
18. Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 2018; 1–38. Doi.org/10.2337/dci18-0033
Review
For citations:
Ivanov D.D., Gozhenko A.I., Savytska L.M. INDIVIDUALIZATION OF RENOPROTECTION IN DEPENDENCE FROM ESTIMATED GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE AND RENAL FUNCTIONAL RESERVE. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2019;23(1):9-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2019-23-1-9-14