Preview

Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg)

Advanced search

Comparative analysis of immunoassay methods for the determination of circulating antibodies to the phospholipase A2 receptor

https://doi.org/10.36485/1561-6274-2020-24-6-71-77

Abstract

THE AIM. Comparison of indirect immunofluorescence (IIFT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods for the determination of circulating antibodies to the podocytic transmembrane receptor of M-type secreted phospholipase A2 (PLA2R-AB) in patients with primary membranous nephropathy (PMN). PATIENTS AND METHODS. The study included 54 patients with PMN (M: F [33:21]) aged 55 (40-63) years and 10 apparently healthy individuals of the corresponding gender and age. Proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was determined in all patients. The anti-PLA2R-AB levels were measured by indirect immunofluorescence (IIFT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using EURUIMMUN AG test systems (Lubeck, Germany). RESULTS. The levels of anti-PLA2R-АB determined by the two investigated methods were changed in the same direction (r = 0.82, p < 0.005). The ELISA method made it possible to detect a larger number of anti-PLA2R-positive cases, both in the group of patients before treatment (ELISA – up to 80 %, IIFT – up to 67 %) and among patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy (ELISA – up to 63 %, IIFT – up to 50 %). The concentration of autoantibodies determined by ELISA (both quantitative and semi- quantitative) correlated with proteinuria (r = 0.69, p = 0.001) and eGFR (r = -0.38, p = 0.035). The response to therapy was more clearly traced when the study was performed by quantitative ELISA. CONCLUSION. The ELISA method is more effective in identifying PLA2R-positive patients with PMN, allows obtaining quantitative results and assessing the dynamics of the concentration of autoantibodies, which contributes to the early correction of the therapy and decisionmaking on immunosuppressive treatment.

About the Authors

O. V. Galkina
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Olga V. Galkina, PhD, Laboratory of Biochemical Homeostasis, Research Institute of Nephrology, Laboratory of Biochemical Homeostasis, Нead

197022, Saint Petersburg, L. Tolstoy st., 17, build. 54
Phone: +7(812)338-69-31 



E. O. Bogdanova
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Bogdanova Evdokia, PhD, Research Institute of Nephrology, Laboratory of Biochemical Homeostasis

197022, Saint Petersburg, L. Tolstoy st., 17, build. 54
Phone: +7(812)338-69-31 



I. M. Zubina
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Irina M. Zubina, PhD, Research Institute of Nephrology, Laboratory of Biochemical Homeostasis

197022, Saint Petersburg, L. Tolstoy st., 17, build. 54
Phone: +7(812)338-69-31



E. N. Levykina
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Elena N. Levykina, PhD, Research Institute of Nephrology, Laboratory of Biochemical Homeostasis

197022, Saint Petersburg, L. Tolstoy st., 17, build. 54
Phone: +7(812)338-69-31 



S. V. Lapin
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Lapin, PhD, Scientific and Methodological Center for Molecular Medicine of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation

197022, Saint Petersburg, L. Tolstoy st., 6-8
Phone: +7(812)338-71-94 



O. Yu. Tkachenko
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Olga Yu. Tkachenko, PhD, Scientific and Methodological Center for Molecular Medicine of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation

197022, Saint Petersburg, L. Tolstoy st., 6-8
Phone: +7(812)338-71-94



A. V. Mazing
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Alexandra V. Mazing, PhD, Scientific and Methodological Center for Molecular Medicine of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation

197022, Saint Petersburg, L. Tolstoy st., 6-8
Phone: +7(812)338-71-94



V. A. Dobronravov
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Prof. Vladimir A. Dobronravov, MD, PhD, DSc, Research Institute of Nephrology, Deputy Director for Research; Department of Propedeutics of Internal Diseases with the Clinic, Professor

197022, Saint Petersburg, L. Tolstoy st., 17, build. 54
Phone: +7(812)338-69-01 



A. V. Smirnov
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Prof. Alexey V. Smirnov, MD, PhD, DMedSci, Research Institute of Nephrology, Director

197022, Saint Petersburg, L. Tolstoy st., 17, build. 54
Phone: +7(921)949-59-32 



References

1. Beck LH Jr, Bonegio RG, Lambeau G et al. M-type phospholipase A2 receptor as target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2009;361(1):11-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810457

2. Dobronravov VA, Lapin SV, Lazareva NM et al. Circulating phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies in primary membranous nephropathy. Nephrology 2012;16(4):39-44. (In Russ) doi: 10.24884/1561-6274-2012-16-4-39-44

3. Li W, Guo Y, Zhang Z et al. Comparison of 2 Anti-PLA2 R Immunoassays for the Diagnosis of Primary Membranous Nephropathy. Lab Med 2018;49(4):316-322. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmy016

4. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med. 2012 367(1):20-29

5. Hoxha E, Harendza S, Zahner G et al. An immunofluorescence test for phospholipase-A 2 -receptor antibodies and its clinical usefulness in patients with membranous glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26(8):2526-2532. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr247

6. Beck L, Bomback AS, Choi MJ et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 2013;62(3):403-441. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.06.002

7. Kanigicherla D, Gummadova J, McKenzie EA et al. AntiPLA2R antibodies measured by ELISA predict long-term outcome in a prevalent population of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int 2013;83(5):940-948. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.486

8. Pourcine F, Dahan K, Mihout F et al. Prognostic value of PLA2R autoimmunity detected by measurement of anti-PLA2R antibodies combined with detection of PLA2R antigen in membranous nephropathy: A single-centre study over 14 years. PLoS One 2017;12(3):e0173201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173201

9. Debiec H, Ronco P. Nephrotic syndrome: A new specific test for idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol 2011;7(9):496-498. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2011.106

10. Pang L, Zhang AM, Li HX et al. Serum anti-PLA2R antibody and glomerular PLA2R deposition in Chinese patients with membranous nephropathy: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96(24):e7218. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007218

11. Song EJ, Jeong KH, Yang YA et al. Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody as a prognostic marker in patients with primary membranous nephropathy. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2018;37(3):248-256. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.2018.37.3.248

12. Hoxha E, Harendza S, Pinnschmidt H et al. PLA2R antibody levels and clinical outcome in patients with membranous nephropathy and non-nephrotic range proteinuria under treatment with inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system. PLoS One 2014;9(10):e110681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110681


Review

For citations:


Galkina O.V., Bogdanova E.O., Zubina I.M., Levykina E.N., Lapin S.V., Tkachenko O.Yu., Mazing A.V., Dobronravov V.A., Smirnov A.V. Comparative analysis of immunoassay methods for the determination of circulating antibodies to the phospholipase A2 receptor. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2020;24(6):71-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36485/1561-6274-2020-24-6-71-77

Views: 474


ISSN 1561-6274 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9439 (Online)