Preview

Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg)

Advanced search

CLINICO"MORPHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISTANT METASTASES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER

https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2005-9-2-108-111

Abstract

THE AIM of the investigation was to reveal clinicomorphological predictors of distant metastases after radical retropubic prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients and to create a prognostic mathematical model of the appearance of this complication. РATIENTS AND METHODS. An analysis of incidence of distant metastases was made in 150 patients with localized forms of prostate cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy with special reference to clinicomorphological factors of risk of this complication. The maximal period of the dynamic followup was 5 years. RESULTS. It was found that the leading risk factors of the appearance of distant metastases proved to be clinical and morphological factors: ingrowth of the tumor into the seminal vesicles by the data of transrectal ultrasonography (F=20.94; p<0.00001) and the degree of tumor differentiation in transrectal biopsy of the prostate (F=26.51; p<0.00001), as well as extracapsular spread of the tumor by the data of a morphological examination of the operation material (F=21.84; p<0.000001). The linear discriminant analysis was used to make a mathematical model which allowed prognosis of the appearance of distant metastases of prostate cancer in 96.6% of cases (l=0.54; p<0.000001). CONCLUSION. Prediction of the appearance of distant metastases of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy should be made with regard for clinicomorphological factors of risk of this complication.

About the Authors

S.Kh. Al-Shukri
Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет им.акад. И.П. Павлова
Russian Federation


S. Yu. Borovets
Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет им.акад. И.П. Павлова
Russian Federation


References

1. АльШукри СХ, Ткачук ВН. Опухоли мочеполовых органов: руководство для врачей. «Питер», СПб, 2000; 278 – 279

2. Downs TM, Kane CJ, Grossfeld GD et al. Surgery for prostate cancer: rationale, technique and outcomes. Cancer Metast Rev 2002; 21 (1): 29 – 44

3. Lepor H. Practical consideration in radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2003; 30(2): 363368

4. Isaacs JT. Molecular markers for prostate cancer metastasis: Developing diagnostic methods for predicting the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. Am J Pathol 1997; 150 (5): 15111521

5. Lerner SE, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ et al. Analysis of risk factors for progression in patients with pathologically confined prostate cancers after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1996; 156 (1): 137143

6. Bostwick DG. Practical clinical application of predictive factors in prostate cancer. A review with an emphasis on quantitative methods in tissue specimens. Am Soc Cytol 1998; 20 (5): 323 – 343

7. Bauer JJ, Connelly RR, Seterhenn IA et al. Biostatistical modeling using traditional preoperative and pathological prognostic variables in the selection of men at high risk for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 1998; 159 (3): 929 – 933

8. Поллаpд Д. Спpавочник по вычислительным методам статистики. Пеp. с англ. – Финансы и статистика, М., 1982; 344


Review

For citations:


Al-Shukri S., Borovets S.Yu. CLINICO"MORPHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISTANT METASTASES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2005;9(2):108-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2005-9-2-108-111

Views: 238


ISSN 1561-6274 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9439 (Online)