Preview

Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg)

Advanced search

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE LAVOMAX USE IN COMPLEX TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONICLE BACTERIAL PROSTATITIS

https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2009-13-2-96-99

Abstract

THE AIM of the investigation is the evaluation of the effectiveness of the lavomax use in patients with chronicle bacterial prostatitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS. The objects of the investigation were 59 patients who were divided in the control and basic group. The control group included 24 patients, who had traditional therapy of the chronicle bacterial prostatitis, and the basic group – of 35 patients, who besides traditional therapy in addition received immunomodulator Lavomax. RESULTS. After the three weeks of treatment the patients of the basic group had an increase in T-lymphocytes amount from 43,2±3,4 to 62,10±3,17%, with full normalization in 32 patients (91,4%), while in the control group this figure came to normal amount only in 16 patients (67%). Lavomax increased the functional activity of T-lymphocytes. More obvious was the increase of blood T-helpers – from 30,2±3,4% to 36,7± 3,8 5 in the basic group, and also with the increase of the T-suppressor/T-helper ratio from  0,93±0,21 to 1,73±0,19. Lavomax had a positive influence on humoral immune system, with the increase of IgA level from 0,78±0,17 g/l to 4,12±1,18 g/l, in control group this figure did not show relative change. CONCLUSION. The received data demonstrates the effectiveness of immunotherapy with the use of Lavomax in patients with chronicle bacterial prostatitis.

About the Author

D. N. Solihov
Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет им. акад. И.П. Павлова
Russian Federation


References

1. Аль-Шукри СХ, Бобков ЮА, Галкина ОБ, и др. Информативность иммунологического анализа крови и эякулята в диагностике хронического простатита. Урология, 2002; (2), 24-27

2. Ткачук ВН. Хронический простатит.М., Медицина для всех, 2006; 112

3. Солихов ДН, Аль-Шукри СХ. Эффективность применения иммуномодулятора у больных хроническим бактериальным простатитом. Российский иммунологический журнал 2008; 2 (11): 36

4. Лоран ОБ, Пушкарь ДЮ, Сегал АС и др. Наше понимание хронического простатита. Фарматека 2002; (10): 69-75

5. Лоран ОБ, Сегал АС. Хронический простатит. X Российский съезд урологов: Материалы. М, 2002; 209 – 222

6. Лопаткин НА. Руководство по урологии. М, 1998; 393-444

7. Nickel I. Clinical evaluation of the patients pressing with prostatitis. Eur Urol [suppl] 2003; 2: 11-14

8. Shaeffer A, Wandner W, Barbalias G. Summary consensus statement: diagnosis and management of chronic prostatitis. Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome. Eur Urol [suppl]2003; 2, 1-4

9. Хаитов РМ, Пинегин БВ. Современные представления о защите организма от инфекции. Иммунология 2000; (1): 61-64

10. Хаитов РМ, Пинегин БВ. Иммуномодуляторы и некоторые аспекты их клинического применения. Клин мед 1996; (8): 7-12

11. Хаитов РМ, Пинегин БВ, Бутаков АА и др. Иммунотерапия инфекционных послеоперационных осложнений с помощью нового иммуностимулятора ликопида. Иммунология 1994;(2) 47-50


Review

For citations:


Solihov D.N. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE LAVOMAX USE IN COMPLEX TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONICLE BACTERIAL PROSTATITIS. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2009;13(2):96-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2009-13-2-96-99

Views: 890


ISSN 1561-6274 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9439 (Online)