Preview

Нефрология

Расширенный поиск

ТЕХНОЛОГИЧЕСКОЕ ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЕ ВЕРИФИКАЦИИ МОЧЕВОГО СИНДРОМА

https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2010-14-4-81-88

Полный текст:

Аннотация

В статье анализируются современные технологические методы верификации мочевого синдрома в условиях скрининговых исследований. Приводятся материалы по применяемым лабораторным методам, используемым при выполнении «общего анализа мочи» в клинико-диагностических лабораториях учреждений здравоохранения России и результаты этих исследований.

Об авторах

В. Л. Эмануэль
Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет им. акад. И.П. Павлова
Россия

кафедра клинической лабораторной диагностики 

197022, Санкт-Петербург, ул. Л.Толстого, д. 6/8, СПбГМУ им. акад. И.П. Павлова.



Е. С. Князева
Sysmex Europe GmbH, г. Гамбург
Германия


Список литературы

1. Kouri T, Fogazzi G,Gant V, Hallander H, Hofmann W, Guder WG, eds. European Urinalysis Guidelines. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2000;60[supl.60]:S1-S96

2. Diven SC, Travis LB. A practical primary care approach to hematuria in children. Pediatric Nephrol 2000; 14:65–72

3. Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf JS et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy—part I: definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology. Urology 2001;57:599-603

4. Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf JS Jr et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy—part II: patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up. Urology 2001;57:604-610

5. Smith P, Morris A, Reller LB. Predicting urine culture results by dipstick testing and phase contrast microscopy. Pathology 2003;35:161-165

6. Смойер ВЕ. Гематурия. В: Шейман ДА, ред. Патофизиология почки. Бином, М, 1997; 138-154

7. Hannemann-Pohl K, Kampf SC. Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture. Clin Chem Lab Med 1999; 37(7):753-764

8. Ishii T, Hara T, Nakayama A, Matsumoto H. Examination of remaining cells by UF-100 in the supernatant after centrifugation Sysmex. J Intern 2003; 13(1):65-70

9. Takahashi M. Atlas of urine sediment. Uchido-Yagi-shoten, 2003

10. Burke JR. Urinary tract infections: investigation in young children. Medicine Today 2003; 4: 69–76.

11. Leman P. Validity of urinalysis and microscopy for detecting urinary tract infection in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 2002;9:141-147

12. Lifshitz E, Kramer L. Outpatient urine culture: does collection technique matter? Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:2537-2540

13. Delanghe JR, Kouri TT, Huber AR et al. The role of automated urine particle flow cytometry in clinical practice. Clin Chim Acta 2000; 301(1-2):1-18

14. Roggeman S, Zaman Z. Safely reducing manual urine microscopy analyses by combining urine flow cytometer and strip results. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116(6):872-878

15. Gessoni G. Valverde S, Maturi P et al. Diagnosis of acute urinary tract infections using Sysmex UF-100. Sysmex J Int 2004;14: 18-22

16. Wang J, Zhang Y, Xu D, Shao W, Lu Y et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol 2010; 133(4): 577-582

17. De Rosa R. Grosso S, Bruschetta G et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF1000i flow cytometer for ruling out bacterial urinary tract infection. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411(15-16):1137-1142

18. Manoni F, Valverde S, Antico F et al. Field evaluation of a second-generation cytometer UF-100 in diagnosis of acute urinary tract infections in adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002;8(10):662-668

19. Evans R, Davidson MM, Sim LR, Hay AJ. Testing by Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and with bacterial culture in a diagnostic laboratory: a comparison. J Clin Pathol 2006, 59(6):661-662

20. Kim SY, Kim YJ, Lee SM et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 urine cell analyzer as a screening test to reduce the need for urine cultures for community-acquired urine tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol 2007; 128(6): 922-925

21. Mehta K, et al «Urinary red cell morphology to detect site of hematuria». Indian Pediatr 1994 Sep;31(9):1039-1045

22. Docci D, Delvecchio C, Turci A et al. Detection of glomerular bleeding by urinary-red-cell-size distribution. Nephron 1988;50(4):380-382

23. Hyodo T, Kumano K, Haga M, Sakai T et al. Detection of glomerular and non-glomerular red blood cells by authometed urinary sediment analyzer. Jpn J Nephrol 1995; 37:35-43

24. Apelanld T, Mestad O, Hetland O. Assessment of haematuria: automated urine flowmetry vs microscop. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16:1615-1619


Для цитирования:


Эмануэль В.Л., Князева Е.С. ТЕХНОЛОГИЧЕСКОЕ ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЕ ВЕРИФИКАЦИИ МОЧЕВОГО СИНДРОМА. Нефрология. 2010;14(4):81-88. https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2010-14-4-81-88

For citation:


Emanuel V.L., Knyazeva E.S. TECHNOLOGICAL SUPPORT OF URINARY SYNDROME VERIFICATION. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2010;14(4):81-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2010-14-4-81-88

Просмотров: 71


ISSN 1561-6274 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9439 (Online)